What Happened To Birejji? Part Two
By wjack2010, 17th Jul 2011 | Follow this author
| RSS Feed | Short URL http://nut.bz/3fvsh910/
Posted in WikinutNewsOff Beat
This is the second part as to what is happening to Birejji after it's Adsense was suspended.
Continuing The Important Part
Birejji Admin appeared earlier, he stated that most villages will now be removed and that he would only keep 2-5 of them. About an hour or so later..a load of villages were removed and 6 were kept.
Then some minutes after that the pots returned with cash in them but of course they were not very high right now in fact they were/are extremely low.
But it is better then having nothing in them.
Many members are now wanting answers from the Adin and even more members have left.
This just shows who the REAL loyal members of Birejji are and shows who truly do care about the site and know the sites potential. After all it is not Birejji's fault that their Adsense was suspended it was in fact the members who click bombed the ads causing it to be suspended.
The Previous Issue
If you would like to see part one of "What happened to Birejji?" then please click here

Comments
19th Jul 2011 (#)
Interesting. Thank you for sharing.:)
Reply to this comment
19th Jul 2011 (#)
You are welcome. Just keeping Birejji members updated with this news story.
Reply to this comment
20th Jul 2011 (#)
Please do not spam :)
Reply to this comment
23rd Jul 2011 (#)
Birejji's google adsense account was really banned because google don't want to advertise with a site that is "Under Construction" and birejji admin do that. He violate the "Terms and Conditions " of google adsense because he had written in each village that site is Under Construction. So the admin is only resposible NOT users.
Thank You Wijack I like Your Post !
Reply to this comment
23rd Jul 2011 (#)
and please remove wrong tags and spams comments from this post. Also I hope admin will return all earning of users and should accept his/her mistake. This is NOT a hate comment it's just a Truth.
Thank You ! :)
Reply to this comment