Australia’s Treatment Of Refugees And Asylum-Seekers Has Been Shameful

amberdextrous By amberdextrous, 14th Oct 2011 | Follow this author | RSS Feed
Posted in Wikinut>News>Politics

Australia was once proud of its international reputation as the Land of the "Fair Go For All" but this has taken a battering in recent years due to our government's treatment of asylum-seekers and refugees.

Introduction to a Complex Issue

There have been times, in recent years, when I have had cause to feel ashamed of my country and its government, especially about some attitudes to, and treatment of, asylum-seekers and refugees.

The United Nations High Commission for Refugees –UNHCR- estimates that more than 20 million people, world-wide, are seeking refuge from wars, famines, droughts, floods and other natural disasters, and from ethnic, religious and political persecution. Many are forced to congregate in ever-more-crowded makeshift camps, often in unsanitary conditions, with inadequate food and shelter, where they may linger for years until some are settled in more affluent countries.

Most refugees do not wish to leave their homelands, with their family, community and cultural ties, to uproot themselves from their familiar surroundings and be forced to learn another language and a whole new set of customs.

Yet many Australians –stirred up by right-wing politicians, shock-jocks and openly racist organisations- worry that a few thousand people each year arrive on our shores in leaky boats, seeking new lives in this prosperous and peaceful land.

Our mainstream media breathlessly announce the arrival of each boatload of families as though Australia was being invaded by an army of brown-skinned terrorists, intent on changing our way of life forever.

The fact is that more than 95 per cent of “illegal non-citizens” in Australia come here by plane. Most of them are young, single, white-skinned and from the United States and the United Kingdom. They arrive on tourist visas and then work illegally, often for years after their visas expire. But of this ‘invasion’ the media say nothing.

Until 2001, my country had a proud reputation as a compassionate and responsible global citizen, willing to welcome those in need of help whatever their ethnic, racial or religious backgrounds. This reputation was shattered in August of that year when a Norwegian freighter, the MV Tampa, obeyed the age-old law of the sea and rescued 438 Afghanis whose boat had sunk nearby.

The Tampa’s Captain, Arne Rinnan, later received a humanitarian award from the Norwegian Government for his actions, but the Australian Government portrayed him as a pariah because of his insistence on transporting the rescued people to the nearest port, Australia’s Christmas Island, in accordance with international maritime law.

Our then Prime Minister, John Howard, slammed his fist on his bully pulpit and spluttered: “We will decide who comes to this country, and the circumstances in which they come.”

Howard also ordered a unit of Australia’s elite Special Air Services Regiment to board the Tampa and take control –arguably, an act of piracy on the high seas- and to steer the ship away from our coastline.

Thankfully, the more humane New Zealand government accepted the 438 asylum-seekers and resettled them in that country.

Since then, conservative politicians have used the arrival of “suspected illegal entry vessels” (SIEVs) as opportunities for political ‘dog-whistling’, appealing to the base racism and the fear of cultural change inherent in some sectors of Australian society. They have implied that some ‘boat people’ could be terrorists, or carriers of exotic diseases.

Howard and his Defence Minister, Peter Reith, told outright lies on the eve of an election, accusing parents of having thrown their children into the ocean so that they would have to be rescued by ships of the Royal Australian Navy. The RAN denied that this had occurred, but the denial received little media coverage, and the damage had already been done. This became known as the “Children Overboard” affair; it should have been called “Truth Overboard.”

The ‘lucky’ few who have since made it to Australia’s shores have been locked up behind razor wire in detention centres, mostly sited in some of Australia’s more remote and inhospitable desert regions, often for years at a time.

Under the stress of overcrowding, isolation, bureaucratic insouciance and uncertainty about their futures, many of these vulnerable, traumatised people –including children- harmed themselves in various ways; some even killed themselves. Many others –again, including children- suffered irreparable psychological trauma as a result of their experiences.

Politicians of all stripes have since sought to make political capital out of the sufferings of desperate people. But one thing is clear: as a signatory to the UNHCR’s convention on refugees, Australia has a legal, moral and ethical responsibility to treat these people in a humane and compassionate manner, rather than exacerbating their traumas.

Australians with a sense of these responsibilities are still waiting for true leadership on this issue, and hoping our government will find a way to deal fairly and justly with refugees and asylum-seekers.

I understand that this is a complex issue, involving matters of national security, community health and welfare, international legal obligations and the participation of ‘people-smugglers’, and I will write more about these aspects in further posts.

moderator Mark Gordon Brown moderated this page.
If you have any complaints about this content, please let us know


author avatar Steve Kinsman
14th Oct 2011 (#)

Just as in Australia, a white person can enter this country and succeed in staying here 'forever', but if you're a person of color we will make it very hard if not impossible for you to remain here. We have sent Muslims back to countries they have fled because of their political views, knowing they face a cerain death when they get there.

Reply to this comment

author avatar amberdextrous
14th Oct 2011 (#)

I am astonished by your comment, Steve! The forced repatriation of refugees to their countries of origin under such circumstances is in direct contravention of the UNHCR's convention. Perhaps the United States is not a signatory to this convention?

Whatever happened to the ideals depicted at the base of the Statue of Liberty?

"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses, yearning to breathe free;
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless, tempest tossed, to me.
I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

I guess that has gone out the window, along with so many of the fine ideals the US once embodied.

I don't know that Australia has been quite so callous and uncaring as to condemn anyone to death in their country of origin by forcing their return.

Thank You for your comment, my Friend.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Mark Gordon Brown
15th Oct 2011 (#)

It made me recall the songs by Midnight Oil about how Australia treated her own people.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Retired
15th Oct 2011 (#)

This is a great post, Amber. I've read before that Australia is a racist country - akin to other supposedly developed Anglo-Saxon countries who are run by "humane" governments.

I am baffled as to why there are people who think that they are superior than others simply because they have ample resources and have the power on how to distribute them or who should enjoy them.

I also find it quite amusing that "white" people refer to non-whites as "colored" when "white" is also a color - a color that is a combination or a collective of all other colors - black, brown, yellow, green, blue, red, etc. Thus, even though it may seem to be the umbrella of colors, "WHITE" is essentially nothing or would have not existed if it weren't for these other colors.

I hope Australian's current breed of politicians, particularly those you've mentioned, Amber, would realize that their power is limited and that they should temper their self-righteous stance with the thought that had the situation been different - or if they were the refugees - they would seek the same kind of compassion that those refugees and hopeful migrants seek.

Aren't they proud that Australia through its government succeeded in marketing itself as a good place to live and work? Are these politicians only after what others can do for them and not what they can do for others, including those who can't do them any favor because they are poor and not "Australians"?

Again, thanks for writing this Amber.

Carry on.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Delicia Powers
15th Oct 2011 (#)

Outstanding article,Thank you amberdextrous...

Reply to this comment

author avatar GV Rama Rao
15th Oct 2011 (#)

Fantastic article from you about your country. You have shown the humane side of your personality. You sure have gone quite a few notches up in my estimate today. Here is wishing more strength to your elbow.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Buzz
15th Oct 2011 (#)

Ditto GV, my friend.

You're such a great Aussie, a kind soul. A Wikinut friend.

Reply to this comment

author avatar amberdextrous
16th Oct 2011 (#)

If the administrators don't do something about spam on this site, I am very soon going to delete all my posts and never return,

Reply to this comment

Add a comment
Can't login?