Is there a cure and/or treatment currently available for Ebola?

Dan Dawson Sr. By Dan Dawson Sr., 6th Oct 2014 | Follow this author | RSS Feed
Posted in Wikinut>News>Health

What is the truth about Ebola? What is really going on? Is there a cure? Is there a cover up? Is money costing lives? What can we do?
You decide!

Is there a cure and/or treatment currently available for Ebola?

Is there a cure and/or treatment currently available for Ebola? And if so, is there an attempt to block its use and its potential effectiveness to protect Big Pharm? (Big Pharmaceutical companies)
Or, are these just attempts by certain unscrupulous individuals, businesses and/or governments to take advantage of this terrible dilemma we are facing for their own financial gain?
I will provide some links, views and opinions for you to consider in hopes that the numbers of you out there will be more informed, take actions to help in some ways that will be, in the long run, beneficial to the potential dangers we face as a global community. Please realize these are just views, opinions and links. It is up to you to decide what is real, true, lies and/or misinformation.

Cures or agendas?

Governments around the world always put their own spin on everything we face. They have many reasons for what they do and say. Some are in our best interests and others, in theirs. All we can do is try to stay informed, decide what is real or not and read between the lines to make the best possible conclusions of what is real and how we should react.

The silver bullet?

I was recently sent an email that said “There is an effective cure for Ebola out there right now but it is being suppressed by the governments. It is NANO SILVER, at 10 PPM."
I have been long aware of the healing properties of silver based medicines. The number one that I have been exposed to and therefore have become somewhat familiar with is “Silvadene Ointment”. I and my family, over many years, have suffered various burns. Each time the doctors have prescribed this amazing ointment. I say “amazing” because I have seen firsthand how it kills almost all signs of infection each and every time I have used it or seen it used.
The number one killer from burns is secondary infection.
According to WebMD: (
“This medication is used with other treatments to help prevent and treat wound infections in patients with serious burns. Silver sulfadiazine works by stopping the growth of bacteria that may infect an open wound. This helps to decrease the risk of the bacteria spreading to surrounding skin, or to the blood where it can cause a serious blood infection (sepsis). Silver sulfadiazine belongs to a class of drugs known as sulfa antibiotics.”
If you do a little research, which I encourage you to do, you will see that there is an awful lot of info on the healing properties of various forms of silver dating back thousands of years.
It is quite interesting and thought provoking.

The takeover of Big Pharm

Since the early 1900s and onward, the world has moved to an almost complete reliance/dependence on pharmaceuticals. We have almost completely forgotten and/or discounted all the homeopathic, natural remedies that mankind has used, some from the very beginnings of our existence.
This has occurred for numerous reasons. One stems from our deep seated feelings for instant gratification. Just this one factor has opened us up to our susceptibility of the most real and prevalent reason, what it always seems to boil down to,…$MONEY$!
In the early days of our transition to rely on “A pill for everything” the early pharmaceutical companies flourished and grew quickly. So did their wealth. This gave them the tool of power and they have been honing their skills to use it ever since.
Today, this industry wields that power through the untold billions in profits they are appreciating. Because of this, they have monopolized us and how we treat almost all maladies the human family experiences.
In almost every election they contribute huge sums of money to the candidates that either support their agendas or they put strings on their contributions to have great influence over any governmental decisions that affect their them.

Spin it & bury it!

The day after I wrote the last article, I Goggled “NANO SILVER, at 10 PPM, effectively kills the Ebola virus”. At the top of the list were numerous links showing the “The DTRA funded a research project between fiscal year 2007 and fiscal year 2009 into a product called Nano Silver”. Now, I can’t seem to find any of them. There are now page after page that you will see on the Ebola, Colloidal Silver subject/controversy and many others. This in and of itself causes me some concerns.

Some healthy debate.

I’d like to share some excerpts from a string of emails between myself and someone I respect:

Me: Please cut & paste the following into your search bar and provide your thoughts: “NANO SILVER, at 10 PPM, effectively kills the Ebola virus”

Read the WHOLE article… the item you present is addressed about 2/3 through…

Me: I already read it.
It does not totally dismiss it and is grey on its dismissal. Wouldn't this almost provide a back door, unintended endorsement? Because the article has FDA oversight, I feel there may be possible conflict.
Part of the FDA's funding comes indirectly from pharmaceutical companies, their donations and influence through campaign contributions. Everyone knows these companies provide large campaign contributions and with them come strong and large commitments.
The FDA is part of the federal governmental system. They seem to, in this position, have a conflict to protect the pharmaceutical companies and push/promote the products they run through FDA processes and approvals.
It would seem that there is a possibility the pharmaceutical companies are the puppeteer behind the curtain.
This link I found ( seems to be mainly about suppression via threats of this information and again protecting the pharmy world under the guise that people tend to be too stupid to make informed decisions on their own (Granted, that is true in some part.) and the FDA wants complete control of products and information.
However, with a little intelligent oversight, it seems that there may be some major relief available and many lives could possibly be saved.
Again…Wouldn't this almost provide another back door, unintended endorsement?

Your thoughts?

Reply: Of course they have oversight… that’s NOT a conflict of interest…

There have been no sanctioned controlled double blind trials. If the data was available, and it showed its efficacy it would be approved. The real issue is without a governing body, pharma would be stupid to invest in cures when they can create maintenance drugs… you can cure yourself out of a market… but maintenance lasts forever. I’m not a conspiracy guy, but I do see what unfettered capitalism can do… don’t get me started on immoral capitalism.

I DO believe that since they used Z-Mapp without testing, there really can’t be a good reason not to try it. If the US Gov’t wanted it to happen, the WHO would buy in… we are the biggest funder…

Me: I just started looking around and it seems there are many articles similar to this one. This is just one of many.
My premise is seemingly being endorsed when you read between the lines.
Your thoughts?

Reply: If you have to read between the lines, that says a lot right there…

Me: Is this what they are using to discredit and stonewall its deployment? “Not peer reviewed” even though they gave permission to use unproven alternatives?
Excerpt from the internet: "The DTRA funded a research project between fiscal year 2007 and fiscal year 2009 into a product called Nano Silver," a spokesperson, who did not want to be identified, said. "The researchers produced slides at the end of that early science research. The data in that presentation was not peer reviewed."

Excerpt from the internet continued: The FDA is firm: "At this point there are no drugs or vaccines that have been shown to be safe and effective to treat or prevent Ebola disease,"

Me: Yet, could this be a lie, because it seems that the U.S. citizens who have contracted Ebola so far and shipped home have, so far, enjoyed a 100% cure rate?
Excerpt from the internet continued: Dr. Luciana Borio, the FDA's Assistant Commissioner for Counterterrorism Policy and Acting Deputy Chief Scientist, says. "FDA is doing all it can do to help expedite development programs."

Me: This seems that only pharmaceuticals are getting promoted. And, from another article (I will list that one below) it seems they are blocking shipments. Couldn't that possibly also show some proof that this is being suppressed by Governments/Big Pharm?

The above is from the University of Michigan. Colloidal silver is being used. Results will be recorded and analyzed. Peer Review is essential in science. The patients who are brought back here have been treated with Z-Mapp as the primary med; however, Z-Mapp is not 100% effective. About half of the few people in West Africa (mostly medical personnel) who received Z-Mapp still died. The biggest difference in why patients who are returned to the US survive is our medical facilities- they are sanitary, we use full isolation, and mostly keep our witch doctors in the lobby.

Your turn!

I just want to strike some nerves, get you thinking, get you motivated to do your own research, have your own debates and get the word out.
Now its your turn!
Getting everyone involved is what it takes to have the best possible outcome to this potential world changing issue.

Research, reach out, encourage others.
TOGETHER we CAN and WILL make a difference!
Only the best my Brothers & Sisters!


Ebola, Ebola Outbreak, Ebola Pandemic, Ebola Virus, Ebola Virus Disease, Pandemic, Pandemic Alert

Meet the author

author avatar Dan Dawson Sr.
Dan Dawson Sr is a Native South Floridian and a very diverse writer. He has a love for poetry, outdoor, spiritual, health, design and fiction.

Share this page

moderator Mark Gordon Brown moderated this page.
If you have any complaints about this content, please let us know


author avatar Fern Mc Costigan
10th Oct 2014 (#)

Ebola by the way things are becoming alarming, soon we will have a vaccine , the good news is the cure

Reply to this comment

author avatar Dan Dawson Sr.
13th Oct 2014 (#)

Hey Fern,
Thanks for your comment, as always!
I've been MIA because of business requirements, but this has made me react to some level of responsibility.
Check out the required timelines of approval, production, transport, politics and finally administering to the public. You will see that there are no reasons to jump for joy yet.
This epidemic will far out run what needs to be done under the current policies and provisions now in place.
Also, with a 21 day incubation period before apparent symptoms manifest, the current travel policies and the real level of world looks as though we are all in for it!
I listened to President Obama say last week, in a part of his address to Americans to quell panic and instill confidence "...this hard to contract disease..."
What a bold faced lie!
I know it sounds extreme, but we absolutely must isolate all people, families, neighborhoods, villages, towns, states, Providences and even countries as required, immediately, to try to stop this underestimated killer!
Only the best,

Reply to this comment

Add a comment
Can't login?