The Clinton Machine - Corrupt to the Core

Steve Kinsman By Steve Kinsman, 5th Jun 2016 | Follow this author | RSS Feed
Posted in Wikinut>News>Politics

From Bill Clinton turning up at polling places to illegally campaign for his wife, to disenfranchising and suppression Bernie Sanders voters, to ordering poll workers to break the law, the Clinton machine will do anything to make certain Hillary wins.

From the disgusting file....

In the run-up to the California primary, record numbers of people have newly registered with the Democratic Party in order to vote Tuesday, June 7th. Democratic Party registration is suddenly up by 490,000, and you can be sure that almost all the new registrants are Bernie Sanders supporters. However, the Party is in abject fear that Hillary Clinton will not win California, so they are resorting to illegal activity to make certain she does. We have known for a long time that Hillary and her people will do anything to win. Today, June 4, 2016, a poll worker in Orange County went to a three hour training class to be a poll worker in her precinct, and she was told that if NPP (No Party Preference) voters request a Democratic ballot, they must be given a provisional ballot. That is, of course, a total lie, as well as completely illegal, but that’s what poll workers are being told by the party. Provisional ballots are literally worthless of course, since they are never counted.

There is a video about this you can watch here:

www.commondreams reports today that the Democratic Party in Puerto Rico has slashed the number of polling places from 2,300 in 2012 to 430 for its primary being held today, Sunday, June 5, 2015. They have also cut the hours allowed to vote to between only 8 AM and 3 PM. This is of course a blatant attempt to drive down voter participation in the primary, which will benefit Clinton.

A couple of weeks ago I watched the returns in Kentucky, where Bernie was ahead by between 2,000 and 2,500 votes all night, when suddenly, after 96 percent of precincts had reported in, the vote margin began to shrink, and at 99% in, Bernie’s lead had evaporated and Hillary was 1,800 votes ahead.

Massachusetts: Bernie won every precinct in Massachusetts that voted by paper ballot by wide margins. Bernie lost every precinct in Massachusetts that voted by electronic machines. Odds of that happening? Infinitesimal.

Iowa: Delegates were awarded to candidates in six caucuses on the basis of a coin toss. Hillary won all six. Odds of that happening? One in six million.

The Clinton machine is corrupt to the core.


California Primary, Clinton Machine, Dirty Politics, Hillary Clinton, Steve Kinsman

Meet the author

author avatar Steve Kinsman
I live in California with my wife Carol, where I have been practicing professional astrology for 35 years. I write articles on astrology, but I enjoy writing on a variety of other subjects as well..

Share this page

moderator johnnydod moderated this page.
If you have any complaints about this content, please let us know


author avatar Stella Mitchell
7th Jun 2016 (#)

I totally agree with you Steve ..and I am not even a USA voter ...but it doesn't take much to see what is going on .
I pray she will not get to be President now or ever .
Bless you
Stella ><

Reply to this comment

author avatar Shamarie
7th Jun 2016 (#)

For the first time in 16 years, I am really considering not voting for this upcoming Presidential election...

Reply to this comment

author avatar Steve Kinsman
7th Jun 2016 (#)

You could write in Bernie's name. I'm considering that. Bernie has not ruled out running with Jill Stein on the Green Party ticket. When someone asked him if he would consider doing that, he did not say he would not, he said "Right now we're concentrating on winning the Democratic nomination." That suggests he's leaving the door open for such a possibility.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Randhir Bechoo
8th Jun 2016 (#)

American politics,I don't know.But I surely get some insight from your pages.Thanks for the share.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Steve Kinsman
9th Jun 2016 (#)

Thank you Randhir. I appreciate your comment.

Reply to this comment

author avatar L. R. Laverde-Hansen
14th Jun 2016 (#)

I'm really sorry, Steve, you cannot accept a legitimate defeat at the polls. Hillary was selected with a plurality of over 3 millions votes (including my own). I spoke with quite a few Hillary voters, and there seemed to be a genuine consensus. People told me things like, "Hillary gets things done," "Bernie's great, but his proposals are not realistic" "Their voting record in the Senate was very similar, but she has more experience."

If I believed every incendiary article online, I might be mystified by her support--especially from people as yourself. But through phonebanking, specific Facebook groups and going out there, I saw that she has a massive following.

Again, if you are unable or unwilling to respect the first woman nominated by a major party for the Presidency of the United States, at least show some respect to the millions of us who came out to vote for her.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Steve Kinsman
18th Jun 2016 (#)

Sorry, L.R., but you had better re-check those vote totals. Aside from the fact that the system was rigged against Bernie from the beginning, with the Democratic establishment, the DNC and the corporate media all lined up in her camp, it is amazing Bernie did as well as he did, and it shows her glaring weakness as a candidate, a candidate with the second lowest approval ratings and the second highest negatives, behind only Trump, as any candidate in history. You just read above, in my article, what happened in Massachusetts, but you just ignore it.

I am going to predict right now: Hillary's presidency will be a disaster. She will ramp up the wars we are in and create new ones, guaranteed. I will also guarantee that in four years you will regret you voted for her.

Why should I show respect for the millions who voted for her. They are all grossly under-informed and misinformed. Anyone who takes the trouble to investigate her past and her record thoroughly would never vote for her.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Chris Romero
25th Jun 2016 (#)

You talk about Hillary Clinton being a corrupt and a fraud. However, it is YOU who is the FRAUD. I remember a few months ago when you predicted Bernie Sanders would be the nominee and then become the next president. It pissed me off, but I kept my cool.

I also study astrology, so does my mother and so do many of my closest friends.

I even consulted with 2 professional astrologers in our community and they said they saw NOTHING indicating Bernie becoming the nominee much less the next president. Bernie Sanders *thinks* he would be a stronger candidate against Trump in the general election?

Please, Hillary Clinton received almost 4 million more votes than Bernie Sanders. Hillary received almost 3 million more votes than Trump. Hell, even Donald Trump received over 1 million more votes than Bernie Sanders! So, Bernie Sanders was the WEAKEST CANDIDATE.

Just admit it. Hillary Clinton won the African American vote, the Latino (my people) vote, the women's vote, the senior citizen vote, the Baby Boomer vote and she even won the Native American vote (10 out of 13 tribal groups in the Midwest endorsed her; plus it was Native American voters who helped Hillary win South Dakota).

You're a disgusting misogynistic White conspiracy theorist. You tried to use YOUR FAKE version of astrology to try and manipulate us into supporting Bernie Sanders. Well, YOU FAILED MISERABLY.

Hillary Clinton won 36 contest (that includes the 2 non-binding primaries of Washington and Nebraska). She won the popular vote, she won majority of the pledged delegates, she received most of the super delegates and she received all of the most important endorsements.

I'm one of the strongest Hillary Clinton supporters you ever meet; I don't allow ANYONE to try and manipulate me. I voted for Hillary Clinton in Florida (my state)'s primary and I will vote for Hillary again this November. She WILL become our next president whether you like it or not. It is US MINORITIES who are calling the shots this election - we choose Hillary Clinton. The Angry White Man is now weaker than ever.

By the way, if you try to manipulate your readers into believing Trump has a chance of beating Hillary this November, then I suggest you think again.

See, many astrologers have been ignoring Eris's influence in Trump's chart - and it ain't looking good for him in November. Chiron will also be a negative aspect in Trump's chart this November too.

All in all, Hillary Clinton wins. We Democrats will also win the Senate too.

Oh, and one of the professional astrologers I personally consulted with also predicts Hillary Clinton to win the presidency in 2020 too. That's 8 years of Madam President!!!

As for you, take your charlatan astrology and your sickening "love" for Bernie Sanders (aka Grandpa Superman) and SHOVE IT!

Reply to this comment

author avatar Steve Kinsman
16th Sep 2016 (#)

First of all, yes, I allowed my love for Bernie to get in the way of my astrological prediction, which I should know better than to do. And yes, astrology predicts a Hillary victory. The Aries ingress chart for this year predicts a Hillary victory, and the Aries ingress chart for 2020 predicts she will be a one-term president and the Republicans will win in four years. So you're wrong that she will be re-elected in 2020 (you heard it here first). Trump loses because Saturn is moving to conjunct his Moon and oppose his Sun. He also accepted the nomination under a void-of-course Moon.

Now, in this article I was merely voicing my opinion. I wasn't trying to manipulate anyone, and for you to accuse me of that is to say the least perplexing to me. Do you attack everyone you meet who is against your candidate so personally and with such hatred and vitriol? You could use some anger management therapy. If you keep blowing your top like this it will soon kill you.

Reply to this comment

Add a comment
Can't login?